Web site supplied to ‘repair’ on-line recipes, however ‘advertisements and life tales’ matter |


Recipeasly isn’t the first website and / or app to be criticized for scraping recipes from food bloggers, online magazines, newspapers, and the like. In 2019, Apple removed Copy Me That from its app store after recipe developers complained to the tech giant. Copy Me That offers premium memberships for $ 12.99 per year (or $ 24.99 for a lifetime membership) that allow users to scale recipes they’ve saved or create custom shopping lists, among other things.

“The app removal was instigated by a handful of website owners who filed complaints with Apple. They say that storing their recipes in your own private recipe box violates their copyrights, ”said Copy Me That in a statement at the time.

“Of course bloggers, photographers and recipe creators deserve to make money with their hard work,” the statement continues. “Because of this, the community recipes encourage visitors to visit the original websites, why even private recipes have a link back and why you need to visit the original website to make your own copy of a recipe.”

A look at the Apple App Store reveals numerous other tools that consumers can use to search external sources for recipes. They have names like Cook’n, Recipe Keeper, RecipeBox and the like.

They are all designed to collect a user’s favorite recipes in one place. This is a convenience for those who don’t want to comb the internet or a library of cookbooks for their favorite dishes. But the apps and websites have increasingly become a source of tension between those who just want recipes with no stories and ads, and food bloggers who rely in part on the stories to generate web traffic, which in turn generates revenue. Stories bloggers tell you that contain keywords, demonstrate authority, and so appease the gods of Google’s algorithm in general that these blogs can rank higher in search results.